Nice to meet you David, I like to think I'm not too bad a boxing writer myself. I agree, I' going with Quigg, it is not a an easy fight to predict, but to me Quigg can hurt Frampton but not vise vurser, so I think any slight technical advantages won't matter in the later rounds, what do you think of Lomackenko vs Walters.
Hello buddy I look forward to it imam David Marcus Reed a Boxing Historian/writer.Along with my great Boxing eye imam set the record straight I love all Boxing every era modern and the classic fighters and fights. Walker Smith is my all-time favorite. I like both men but I picked Scott Quigg so I got to stick with my first pick.
I heard his fight on the canelo vs cotto undercard was really boring. I also heard he was landing less than 10 punches a round and winning the rounds. A lot of people love his boxing skills and compare him to Mayweather but I don't really know because I don't really watch any of his fights. But Mayweather is a lot better than him. He doesn't get knocked down at all and he's more exciting. I think that Lomachenko would beat him and Roman Gonzalez would beat him if he moved up in weight.
Not a fan, not at all, I thought his fight on the under card of Cotto vs Canelo was an absolute snoozefest, it was just awful, Rigo is a bit like Odlanier Solis in my opinion, you know what happened to him right?, got so much potential and so much talent, but just not enough heart and determination to perform to the best of his ability. You might winder why Rigo vs whoever he fought was boring but !a weather vs Pacquiao wasn't and neither was Fury vs Klitschko, it is because when two fighters are trying to negate each other's weapons and nullify each other down the stretch, this is entertaining in a different way to a war, but when one guy is just there for the money and knows he can't sink and the other just can't be bothered to do anything but just about do enough to win the majority of the rounds, this is a really boring fight, do you agree?
The reason why it is not a hard choice for me is because it is one thing to be a puncher, but you have to be brilliant, and I mean brilliant at setting up knock outs if you are hopeful of scoring one over a boxing mastermind like Lomachenko, did you see him school Gary Russell? That was an awesome performance, in a fight I predicted him to lose, I think he will make easy work of Walters.
This is a hard choice for me. I don't know who I think will win yet. I think Walters has the power to win but lomachenko has the boxing abilities to beat Walters.
Nice to meet you David, I like to think I'm not too bad a boxing writer myself. I agree, I' going with Quigg, it is not a an easy fight to predict, but to me Quigg can hurt Frampton but not vise vurser, so I think any slight technical advantages won't matter in the later rounds, what do you think of Lomackenko vs Walters.
Hello buddy I look forward to it imam David Marcus Reed a Boxing Historian/writer.Along with my great Boxing eye imam set the record straight I love all Boxing every era modern and the classic fighters and fights. Walker Smith is my all-time favorite. I like both men but I picked Scott Quigg so I got to stick with my first pick.
I heard his fight on the canelo vs cotto undercard was really boring. I also heard he was landing less than 10 punches a round and winning the rounds. A lot of people love his boxing skills and compare him to Mayweather but I don't really know because I don't really watch any of his fights. But Mayweather is a lot better than him. He doesn't get knocked down at all and he's more exciting. I think that Lomachenko would beat him and Roman Gonzalez would beat him if he moved up in weight.
Not a fan, not at all, I thought his fight on the under card of Cotto vs Canelo was an absolute snoozefest, it was just awful, Rigo is a bit like Odlanier Solis in my opinion, you know what happened to him right?, got so much potential and so much talent, but just not enough heart and determination to perform to the best of his ability. You might winder why Rigo vs whoever he fought was boring but !a weather vs Pacquiao wasn't and neither was Fury vs Klitschko, it is because when two fighters are trying to negate each other's weapons and nullify each other down the stretch, this is entertaining in a different way to a war, but when one guy is just there for the money and knows he can't sink and the other just can't be bothered to do anything but just about do enough to win the majority of the rounds, this is a really boring fight, do you agree?
I'll have to watch Lomachenko vs Russell Jr. Maybe that fight will help me make my decision for this fight. What do you think of rigo?
The reason why it is not a hard choice for me is because it is one thing to be a puncher, but you have to be brilliant, and I mean brilliant at setting up knock outs if you are hopeful of scoring one over a boxing mastermind like Lomachenko, did you see him school Gary Russell? That was an awesome performance, in a fight I predicted him to lose, I think he will make easy work of Walters.
This is a hard choice for me. I don't know who I think will win yet. I think Walters has the power to win but lomachenko has the boxing abilities to beat Walters.
Pages