Good point tales, but I have a very simple explanation, why did Mosley get dominated? Becuase he fought when he was out of date, there is a reason boxers are told to retire, if you look at what Pacquiao did to a younger De La Hoya you see what I mean, Pacquiao dominated De La Hoya in much more one sided fashion than he did Mosley. I'm not a De La Hoya fan, I think he was a bad sportsman and he has become an unsincear promoter, I thought he was an idiot against Feix Trinidad, I believe he won, but he ust completely gae away the championship rounds out of sheer laziness, and he has never been abe to handle the fcat that he didn't get the decision against Mayweather, a Mayweather who I believe coud have done a ot better and would have been him a very one sided fight in a rematch, Mosely on the other hand fought a much more experienced Mayweather, and had him in serious trouble early on.
Do you guys really think Shane Mosley was better than Oscar De La Hoya? I know it's just your opinion, but in my opinion there's no way that Mosley was better or had a better career than De La Hoya. DLH in his prime was a beast and had beaten many great fighters. DLH also has been in many classic fights. Yes a lot of his fights were close, but that's what made him so exciting.
Check out his fights vs. Mayweather, Vargas, Whitaker, Quartey, Chavez, Mayorga. They're all great fights in my opinion.
DLH had never been dominated in any of his fights, but Mosley has been dominated many times (Canelo, Pacquiao, Mayweather, Winky x2, Forrest).
Posted same comment reply twice accidently.
Good point tales, but I have a very simple explanation, why did Mosley get dominated? Becuase he fought when he was out of date, there is a reason boxers are told to retire, if you look at what Pacquiao did to a younger De La Hoya you see what I mean, Pacquiao dominated De La Hoya in much more one sided fashion than he did Mosley. I'm not a De La Hoya fan, I think he was a bad sportsman and he has become an unsincear promoter, I thought he was an idiot against Feix Trinidad, I believe he won, but he ust completely gae away the championship rounds out of sheer laziness, and he has never been abe to handle the fcat that he didn't get the decision against Mayweather, a Mayweather who I believe coud have done a ot better and would have been him a very one sided fight in a rematch, Mosely on the other hand fought a much more experienced Mayweather, and had him in serious trouble early on.
115-112
Dominated? Wow. I scored it 114-113 DLH. What did you score it?
DLH did have some controversial decisions that he shouldn't have won. He shouldn't have beat quartey. I thought he got dominated against quartey.
DLH was only dominated by Pacquiao. That's his only convincing loss imo.
Do you guys really think Shane Mosley was better than Oscar De La Hoya? I know it's just your opinion, but in my opinion there's no way that Mosley was better or had a better career than De La Hoya. DLH in his prime was a beast and had beaten many great fighters. DLH also has been in many classic fights. Yes a lot of his fights were close, but that's what made him so exciting.
Check out his fights vs. Mayweather, Vargas, Whitaker, Quartey, Chavez, Mayorga. They're all great fights in my opinion.
DLH had never been dominated in any of his fights, but Mosley has been dominated many times (Canelo, Pacquiao, Mayweather, Winky x2, Forrest).
Pages